Exploring Corporate Employees' Perceptions and Experiences of Ergonomics and Ergonomically Designed Workstations in Karachi, Pakistan

Authors

  • Dr. Jawwaria Naeem Alvi Consultant Physiotherapist at Patient aids' foundation JPMC Author
  • Muhammad Tahir Akram Consultant Physiotherapist at Jinnah Post Medical Center (JPMC), Incharge Physiotherapist at Baws health facility, and Public health Specialist Author
  • Aisha Jabeen Consultant Physiotherapist in Physiotherapy OPD and Ponseti Clinic at Patient’s Aid Foundation JPMC Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63075/hqvv5r04

Abstract

Ergonomics is essential for promoting employee health, comfort, and productivity, yet its implementation in Pakistan's corporate sector remains limited. This qualitative study investigates corporate employees' perceptions and lived experiences regarding ergonomics and ergonomically designed workstations. Data collected through semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 20 employees from various organizations in Karachi, Pakistan were analyzed thematically. Findings reveal limited ergonomic awareness, organizational and cultural barriers, and employee-led workstation adaptations. The study underscores the need for increased ergonomic education, participatory approaches, and organizational commitment to foster healthier work environments. These insights inform policymakers and corporate leaders aiming to improve occupational health in Pakistan.

Keywords: Ergonomics, Workplace ergonomics, Ergonomically designed workstations, Employee perceptions, Occupational health, Workplace design, Corporate employees, Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), Office ergonomics, Employee productivity, Workplace comfort, Organizational ergonomics, Ergonomic awareness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-04

How to Cite

Exploring Corporate Employees’ Perceptions and Experiences of Ergonomics and Ergonomically Designed Workstations in Karachi, Pakistan. (2025). Annual Methodological Archive Research Review, 3(6), 110-120. https://doi.org/10.63075/hqvv5r04